Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether income from tissue culture operations and cultivation of ornamental plants constituted agricultural income in full, and whether the income required bifurcation between agricultural and non-agricultural components.
Analysis: Agricultural income under Section 2(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 requires income to be derived from land used for agricultural purposes. The reasoning distinguished between operations carried out on land, including sowing and cultivation, and tissue culture activities conducted in laboratory conditions, which do not by themselves amount to agricultural operations. At the same time, the record did not establish any reliable basis for the 70:30 or 90:10 apportionment adopted earlier, and the affidavit asserting that no laboratory operations were carried on required verification. A field inspection was therefore directed to ascertain the actual nature of the assessee's activities and to determine the proper apportionment, if any, on the basis of expenditure and operations actually carried out.
Conclusion: The matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for field inspection and fresh determination of the agricultural and non-agricultural components, with full exemption available only if the activities were found to be carried on in land as claimed; otherwise, income was to be bifurcated appropriately.