TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Allows Appeal: Clarification on Setting Off Capital Losses & Gains</h1> <h3>Vipul A. Shah Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax</h3> Vipul A. Shah Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax - TMI Issues Involved:1. Set off of indexed long-term capital loss against non-indexed long-term capital gains.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Set off of indexed long-term capital loss against non-indexed long-term capital gains:The primary issue in this appeal was whether the assessee could set off indexed long-term capital loss against non-indexed long-term capital gains. The assessee, an individual engaged in share trading, filed a return of income for the assessment year 2004-05, offering income under the head 'Capital Gains.' The assessee computed long-term capital gains and losses as follows:- Long-term capital loss (with indexation): Rs. 6,47,991- Long-term capital gains (without indexation): Rs. 63,11,933The assessee claimed the set off of the indexed long-term capital loss against the non-indexed long-term capital gains.Section 48 of the Income-tax Act, 1961:Section 48 provides the mode of computing capital gains, allowing the assessee to increase the cost of acquisition by applying the Cost Inflation Index, thereby reducing the taxable capital gain. However, the benefit of indexation is only available for long-term capital assets.Section 112 of the Income-tax Act, 1961:Section 112 specifies the tax rates on long-term capital gains. If the assessee opts out of indexation, the long-term capital gains are taxed at a lower rate of 10% instead of the standard 20%.Assessing Officer's View:The Assessing Officer disallowed the set off, arguing that the computation of long-term capital loss (with indexation) and long-term capital gain (without indexation) were not similar as required by Section 70(3) of the Act. According to the Assessing Officer, the set off could only be permitted when the mode of computation of both gains and losses was similar.CIT(A)'s Decision:The CIT(A) upheld the Assessing Officer's decision, emphasizing the importance of 'similar computation' in Section 70(3). The CIT(A) reasoned that only if the capital gains and losses were computed similarly could the set off be allowed.Tribunal's Analysis:The Tribunal examined the provisions of Section 70(3), which allows the set off of long-term capital loss against long-term capital gain if the computation is made under sections 48 to 55 of the Act. The Tribunal concluded that the term 'similar computation' referred to the computation under sections 48 to 55, not the specific methods of computation (indexation vs. non-indexation).The Tribunal noted that Section 70(3) existed before the introduction of the proviso to Section 112(1) (which allows non-indexed gains to be taxed at a lower rate). Therefore, the legislature could not have intended the term 'similar computation' to mean different methods of computation under the second proviso to Section 48 and the proviso to Section 112(1).Conclusion:The Tribunal held that the expression 'similar computation' in Section 70(3) referred to the computation under sections 48 to 55 of the Act and not the specific methods of computation under the second proviso to Section 48 and the proviso to Section 112(1). Consequently, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to accept the assessee's claim for setting off the indexed long-term capital loss against the non-indexed long-term capital gains.Result:The appeal by the assessee was allowed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
