Deemed gift under the Gift-tax Act was not attracted where partnership retirement value could not measure consideration for initial land contribution.

Land introduced by a partner as capital contribution to a partnership firm was treated as a transfer within the Gift-tax Act, but the notional book entry in the firm's accounts was not the real consideration for that transfer. The partner's rights in the firm, including profit share and a share in net assets on dissolution or retirement, were held to be continuing partnership rights, while the amount received on retirement depended on future partnership fortunes. Because section 4(1)(a) applies only where monetary consideration is shown to be inadequate at the time of transfer, the higher retirement amount could not be used to measure inadequacy. The difference was therefore not a deemed gift and no gift-tax was leviable.

---

---

Issues: Whether land introduced by partners as capital contribution to a partnership firm, and the higher amount received on retirement, gave rise to a deemed gift chargeable under section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act.

Analysis: A partner who brings personal immovable property into a firm does transfer property within the wide definition in the Gift-tax Act, but the consideration for such transfer is not the book entry made in the firm's accounts. The partner acquires the status of a partner and a right to share in profits and to realise his share in the net assets on dissolution or retirement, while retaining a continuing interest in the partnership assets. The amount credited in the books is only notional and does not represent the market value of the property. Since section 4(1)(a) applies only where there is a monetary consideration and that consideration is shown to be inadequate, the later retirement value cannot be used to determine inadequacy at the time of the original contribution. The quantum received on retirement depends on future partnership fortunes and cannot be treated as the measure of consideration for the initial transfer.

Conclusion: The difference between the book value and the amount received on retirement was not a deemed gift under section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act, and gift-tax was not leviable.

---