Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the refund of special additional duty was admissible when the invoice showed SAD as nil and no separate endorsement was made in the invoice in terms of condition 2(b) of the notification.
Analysis: The refund claim arose under Notification No. 102/07-Cus governing refund of SAD on imported goods subsequently sold on payment of VAT. The invoice reflected SAD as nil, showing that the incidence of SAD had not been passed on to the buyer. On that basis, the object of the notification was found to have been satisfied. The absence of a formal endorsement was treated as non-fatal because the invoice itself disclosed the relevant fact and exemption notifications were to be read liberally. The condition in the notification was therefore treated as complied with in substance.
Conclusion: The refund claim was admissible and the denial of refund was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the assessee was held entitled to refund of SAD with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the invoice itself shows nil SAD and the statutory object of preventing passing on of the duty incidence is satisfied, a formal endorsement requirement under the refund notification may be treated as substantially complied with and refund cannot be denied on that technical ground.