Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund of CENVAT credit under Rule 5 was admissible when the assessee was exporting goods but there was no finding that the credit could not be utilized.
Analysis: Refund under Rule 5 is available only when the credit taken on inputs used in exported goods cannot be adjusted against duty on clearances. The assessee was also clearing goods in the market and, during the relevant period, was paying substantial duty from the PLA after utilizing credit. The appellate order did not record any finding that the assessee was unable to utilize the credit claimed as refund. In the absence of such a finding, and in view of the material showing continued utilization of credit, the refund claim could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The refund was not admissible and the appellate order granting refund was set aside.