Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether denial of MODVAT credit on the allegation of fake and fictitious invoices and non-existent weavers called for final adjudication or remand for de-novo consideration.
Analysis: The dispute related to denial of MODVAT credit on the ground that the credit had been taken on the basis of allegedly fake invoices. The Tribunal noted that an identical issue had already been remanded in earlier connected matters for de-novo adjudication, and also referred to another order where such matters were disposed of by remand without insisting on pre-deposit. In the present appeals, the impugned order was therefore set aside and the matter was sent back to the Original Adjudicating Authority for fresh decision in the light of the earlier observations.
Conclusion: The denial of credit was not finally sustained at this stage and the matter was remanded for de-novo adjudication in favour of the appellants.
Final Conclusion: The appeals were disposed of by setting aside the impugned order and directing fresh adjudication by the Original Adjudicating Authority.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an identical controversy has already been remanded for fresh adjudication, the proper course is to set aside the impugned order and direct de-novo decision rather than finally determine the credit entitlement.