Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2011 (3) TMI 980 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Determines Deduction Computation Rules, Interest Not Retroactive The Tribunal upheld the computation of deduction under Section 80HHC based on profit as per accounts for determining book profit under Section ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal Determines Deduction Computation Rules, Interest Not Retroactive

                            The Tribunal upheld the computation of deduction under Section 80HHC based on profit as per accounts for determining book profit under Section 115JA/115JB. It found adjustments involving debatable issues beyond the scope of rectification under Section 154. Interest under Section 234D was held not applicable retrospectively, directing verification by the Assessing Officer based on the judgment in CIT vs. Bajaj Hindustan Ltd. The revenue's appeal was dismissed for certain assessment years, while the assessee's appeal was allowed for others, with matters remanded for verification.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Computation of deduction under Section 80HHC for the purpose of determining book profit under Section 115JA/115JB.
                            2. Applicability of Explanation (baa) to Section 80HHC in computing book profit.
                            3. Scope of rectification under Section 154.
                            4. Levy of interest under Section 234D.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Computation of Deduction under Section 80HHC for Book Profit under Section 115JA/115JB:
                            The primary issue revolves around whether the deduction under Section 80HHC should be computed based on the book profit as per accounts or as per the normal provisions of the Income Tax Act. The assessee argued that the deduction should be computed based on the book profit, as directed by the CIT(A), and not restricted to the amount allowable under normal provisions. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s direction that the deduction under Section 80HHC should be computed with reference to the profit as per accounts for determining book profit under Section 115JA/115JB.

                            2. Applicability of Explanation (baa) to Section 80HHC in Computing Book Profit:
                            The Assessing Officer reduced 90% of other income such as interest and profit on the sale of investments from eligible business profit while computing the deduction under Section 80HHC for book profit. The CIT(A) found this adjustment debatable and beyond the scope of Section 154. The Tribunal agreed, noting that the CIT(A) had directed the deduction to be computed based on the profit as per accounts, and thus, there was no mistake warranting rectification under Section 154.

                            3. Scope of Rectification under Section 154:
                            The Tribunal observed that the issue of whether Explanation (baa) applies to the computation of deduction under Section 80HHC for book profit was highly debatable. Hence, it was beyond the scope of Section 154, which is limited to rectifying mistakes apparent from the record. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision that the adjustments made by the Assessing Officer were beyond the scope of Section 154.

                            4. Levy of Interest under Section 234D:
                            The Tribunal noted that the provisions of Section 234D were introduced with effect from 01.06.2003 and had no retrospective effect. Therefore, interest under Section 234D could not be charged for refunds granted prior to this date. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to ascertain the exact date of the corresponding refund and decide the issue in accordance with the judgment of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs. Bajaj Hindustan Ltd.

                            Separate Judgments:
                            - For the assessment years 1999-2000 and 2000-01, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal on the adjustment issue and restored the matter of interest under Section 234D to the Assessing Officer for verification.
                            - For the assessment years 2001-02 and 2002-03, the Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, reversing the CIT(A)'s order on the adjustment issue, and restored the interest issue to the Assessing Officer for verification.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal's judgment emphasized that the computation of deduction under Section 80HHC for determining book profit should be based on the profit as per accounts, and any adjustments involving debatable issues are beyond the scope of rectification under Section 154. Additionally, the levy of interest under Section 234D is not applicable retrospectively. The appeals were disposed of accordingly, with some matters remanded to the Assessing Officer for further verification.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found