Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether surplus credited to the share premium account on amalgamation, though not received in cash, was hit by Explanation 2 to rule 2 of the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964. (ii) Whether such surplus constituted an "other reserve" within rule 1(iii) of the Second Schedule and was includible in capital for surtax purposes.
Issue (i): Whether surplus credited to the share premium account on amalgamation, though not received in cash, was hit by Explanation 2 to rule 2 of the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964.
Analysis: Explanation 2 was treated as restricting only the inclusion of share premium in paid-up share capital where the premium was received in cash. The surplus arising on amalgamation was held to be a special category, distinct from ordinary share premium, and its character had to be determined under the capital computation provisions read with the balance-sheet classification of "reserves and surplus". The principle in Standard Vacuum Oil Co. was applied to hold that surplus of this nature represents capital by way of reserve and is not exhausted by the cash-premium requirement in Explanation 2.
Conclusion: The surplus was not hit by Explanation 2 to rule 2 and could not be excluded merely because it was not received in cash.
Issue (ii): Whether such surplus constituted an "other reserve" within rule 1(iii) of the Second Schedule and was includible in capital for surtax purposes.
Analysis: The statutory balance-sheet form in the Sixth Schedule to the Companies Act, 1956 distinguishes share capital from reserves and surplus, and share premium appears under reserves and surplus. On that footing, the amount arising from the excess of the net assets taken over over the face value of shares issued on amalgamation was held to be capital in the form of reserve. The reasoning in Standard Vacuum Oil Co. was regarded as supporting the view that such surplus may be treated as reserve for capital computation under the surtax scheme.
Conclusion: The surplus was an "other reserve" within rule 1(iii) and was includible in capital for surtax purposes.
Final Conclusion: The referred questions were answered in favour of the assessee, and the share premium surplus arising on amalgamation was held to form part of capital as reserve for surtax computation.
Ratio Decidendi: Surplus arising on amalgamation and credited to share premium account is, in substance, a reserve forming part of capital under the surtax computation scheme, and Explanation 2 to rule 2 excludes only cash premium from treatment as paid-up share capital, not such amalgamation surplus as reserve.