Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to the concessional rate of duty under Notification No. 9/99-CE for the relevant period when the declaration under Rule 173B was filed instead of a separate declaration in the prescribed form.
Analysis: The condition in the notification required the manufacturer to exercise the option in writing before the first clearance so that the department was put on notice of the intention to claim the exemption. The appellant filed a declaration under Rule 173B on 1.4.1999, which was acknowledged by the department and contained the material particulars required by the notification, including the assessee's details, description of goods, factory location, the date of exercise of option, and the relevant clearance figures. The Tribunal followed the earlier view that there was no requirement of a separate declaration in a specified proforma when the departmental intimation had otherwise been given in writing before clearance.
Conclusion: The appellant satisfied the condition of the notification by substantial compliance, and denial of the concessional rate of duty was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a fiscal exemption requires written intimation of the option before clearance and no specific proforma is prescribed, a declaration filed under the relevant excise procedure that effectively notifies the department constitutes sufficient compliance.