TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>CESTAT Chennai: Appeal on Penalties under Finance Act Sections 77 & 78 Rejected, Section 76 Penalty Set Aside</h1> <h3>Commissioner of Central Excise, Tirunelveli Versus R. Valathi Raja</h3> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai rejected the department's appeal on penalties under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The lower ... Penalty - lower appellate authority has upheld the penalties imposed under Section 77 and Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, but has set aside the penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, one of the penalties imposed under Section 76 or under Section 78, is sufficient keeping in view the subsequent amendment to the law making these penalties mutually exclusive, the department's appeal is rejected. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai rejected the department's appeal regarding penalties imposed under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The lower appellate authority upheld the penalties but set aside the penalty under Section 76. The Tribunal held that one of the penalties under Section 76 or Section 78 is sufficient due to the penalties being mutually exclusive after a law amendment.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
