1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Court allows revenue's appeal, sets aside Tribunal's decision for assessment year 1991-92. Case remanded for fresh determination.</h1> The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the revenue's appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the Income Tax Appellate ... Cancelling the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) - the concealment of income on account of under valuation of closing stock of the rice - t the matter is covered by order of this Court in CIT v. Pearey Lal and Sons (EP) Ltd. (2008 -TMI - 32381 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT), wherein it was held that a formal order of satisfaction was not required to be recorded, as held by the Tribunal in the impugned order - Hence, the impugned order of the Tribunal and remand the matter to it for a fresh decision on merits in accordance with law. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana heard an appeal by the revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeal was against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh for the assessment year 1991-92. The court set aside the Tribunal's order and remanded the matter for a fresh decision on merits in accordance with the law. Parties were directed to appear before the Tribunal on 18.4.2011.