1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appellate Tribunal allows CENVAT Credit of Education Cess for 100% EOU</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, in a case concerning the admissibility of CENVAT Credit of Education Cess on invoices from a 100% EOU, rejected ... Admissibility of CENVAT Credit of Education Cess in respect of invoices issued by 100% EOU - formula prescribed under Rule 3(7)(a) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 β Held that:- The issue is no longer res-integra and credit of Education Cess is admissible. See Shreya Pets Pvt.Ltd. Vs CCE Hyderabad-(2008 - TMI - 34729 - CESTAT, Banglore) Issues:1. Admissibility of CENVAT Credit of Education Cess on invoices from 100% EOU.Analysis:The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad dealt with the issue of the admissibility of CENVAT Credit of Education Cess on invoices from a 100% EOU. The assessee had availed CENVAT Credit based on invoices from the EOU, leading to proceedings being initiated by the Department. The Department contended that the CENVAT Credit should be calculated as per the formula under Rule 3(7)(a) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, which allows for 50% credit for goods manufactured by EOU. However, the Tribunal referred to precedent decisions, including the case of Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd Vs CCE Pune 2008 and others, where it was held that the credit of Education Cess is admissible in such cases.The Tribunal noted that the Department had not considered the precedent decisions while filing the appeal. The Tribunal, after hearing both sides, found that the issue was no longer res-integra due to the established precedent in favor of allowing the credit of Education Cess on invoices from 100% EOU. Consequently, the appeal filed by the Revenue was rejected, and the cross objection filed by the respondent was disposed of. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering precedent decisions in similar cases, highlighting the need for consistency in legal interpretations and applications.In conclusion, the judgment clarified the admissibility of CENVAT Credit of Education Cess on invoices from 100% EOU, based on established precedent decisions. It underscored the significance of following legal precedents to ensure uniformity and fairness in decision-making processes. The Tribunal's ruling in this case reaffirmed the entitlement of the assessee to claim the CENVAT Credit of Education Cess, in line with the prescribed rules and previous judicial interpretations.