Export commission for services rendered outside India is not subject to tax deduction at source; salary disallowance also fails absent employment relationship.

Export commission paid to a non-resident agent for services rendered outside India is generally not chargeable to tax in India, so section 195 does not require tax deduction at source on such payment. Where the factual record does not clearly establish the exact nature of the services or the treaty character of the arrangement, limited verification may still be required. A payment cannot be treated as salary for disallowance under section 40(a)(iii) unless an employer-employee relationship exists; absent that relationship, the salary disallowance is inapplicable.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the commission paid to the non-resident agent was established to be for services rendered; (ii) whether tax was deductible at source under section 195 on the payment made for services rendered outside India; (iii) whether Article 15 of the India-US DTAA excluded taxability in India; and (iv) whether the payment could be disallowed as salary under section 40(a)(iii).

Issue (i): Whether the commission paid to the non-resident agent was established to be for services rendered.

Analysis: The assessee produced the agreement and export details, but the record did not contain adequate material to verify the exact nature of the services and the linkage between the commission payment and the services allegedly rendered. The Tribunal noted that the assessing authority had called for supporting evidence, including the basis of the commission and the services performed, and that these particulars were not fully furnished. Since the factual foundation was incomplete, the issue required fresh verification.

Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the assessing officer for fresh examination of the nature of services rendered.

Issue (ii): Whether tax was deductible at source under section 195 on the payment made for services rendered outside India.

Analysis: The services were stated to have been rendered in America, outside India. The Tribunal relied on the principle that section 195 applies only where the sum paid is chargeable to tax in India, and on the CBDT circular and advance ruling referred to in the order, to hold that export commission for services rendered outside India is not chargeable to tax in India. On that basis, no obligation to deduct tax at source arose.

Conclusion: The payment was held not to attract section 195.

Issue (iii): Whether Article 15 of the India-US DTAA excluded taxability in India.

Analysis: The Tribunal observed that the non-resident had no fixed base in India and that the services were rendered outside India. However, it also noted that the material on record did not clearly establish the professional character of the services in the manner contemplated by the treaty, and therefore sent the matter back for factual verification on that aspect. The treaty point was treated as largely academic because the payment was already found not chargeable to tax in India for want of a fixed base in India.

Conclusion: The treaty issue was remanded for limited factual verification and was otherwise academic.

Issue (iv): Whether the payment could be disallowed as salary under section 40(a)(iii).

Analysis: The Tribunal found that there was no employer-employee relationship between the assessee and the non-resident agent. In the absence of such relationship, the payment could not be characterised as salary for the purpose of disallowance under section 40(a)(iii).

Conclusion: The disallowance under section 40(a)(iii) was not sustainable.

Final Conclusion: The appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes, the matter being restored for limited factual verification while the legal position on non-taxability of the foreign commission and the inapplicability of salary disallowance was accepted.

Ratio Decidendi: Section 195 applies only to sums chargeable to tax in India, and a payment for services rendered wholly outside India is not deductible at source; a commission payment cannot be disallowed as salary absent an employer-employee relationship.

---