Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the importer was entitled to exemption from customs duty on re-export of unutilised imported goods under Notification No. 93/2004-Cus dated 10.09.2004 and Clause 2.35 of the Foreign Trade Policy.
Analysis: The import was governed by a specific exemption notification issued under Section 25(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, and the benefit of exemption could be claimed only in accordance with its terms. The notification permitted re-export only on specified contingencies, namely where the materials were defective or unfit for use and the claim for re-export was made within the prescribed period. The general permission in the Foreign Trade Policy for export of goods in the same or substantially same form could not override the specific conditions attached to the notification. Since the case did not satisfy the notified contingencies, the earlier tribunal view relied upon by the assessee was held inapplicable.
Conclusion: The importer was not entitled to exemption from duty on re-export of the unutilised goods, and the issue was answered in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Where imports are covered by a specific exemption notification, re-export and exemption can be claimed only within the strict terms of that notification, and a general policy provision cannot enlarge the exemption.