Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Central Government had power under the Rubber Act, 1947 to issue a notification fixing rubber cess at zero paise for export-oriented units and thereby granting exemption from payment of cess, and whether such notification was valid in view of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
Analysis: Section 12(1) of the Rubber Act, 1947 authorises the Central Government only to appoint the date of levy and fix the rate of cess within the statutory ceiling. The levy is on rubber produced in India, while Section 12(2) provides only the manner of collection. No provision in the Act confers power on the Central Government to exempt any class of manufacturers or units from the statutory cess. Fixing the rate at zero paise was treated as an indirect method of granting exemption, which could not be done when the statute itself contained no such enabling power. A policy decision or executive order cannot override the parent statute or its legislative object.
Conclusion: The notification was held to be beyond the power conferred by the Act and invalid.
Final Conclusion: The challenge to the notification succeeded, and the impugned levy exemption was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: An executive notification fixing a statutory cess at nil rate amounts to an exemption and is ultra vires where the parent Act authorises only fixation of the rate and does not empower the Government to grant exemptions.