Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refusal of registration of a firm under section 185(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could stand when it rested solely on an earlier Tribunal view that had since been overruled.
Analysis: The refusal order was founded entirely on the premise that the use of an abkari licence standing in the name of one partner in the firm's business amounted to an illegal transfer of rights to the other partners. That premise was taken from earlier Tribunal decisions. The later Special Bench decision had considered the relevant provisions of the Abkari Act and had taken the contrary view that carrying on the firm's business on such a licence did not involve illegality and that registration could not be denied on that basis alone. Since the Income-tax Officer had not made any independent consideration apart from relying on the overruled view, the refusal could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The refusal of registration was quashed and the application was remitted for fresh consideration in the light of the later Special Bench decision. The result was in favour of the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: A refusal of registration cannot be sustained when it is based solely on a precedent that has been overruled and the authority has not independently examined the matter on its own merits.