Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Dettol is a disinfectant within item 12 of Schedule K of the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 and, if so, whether its stocking, exhibiting and sale require a licence under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and attract prosecution under Section 27(b)(ii) of the Act.
Analysis: Section 18(c) of the Act prohibits manufacture for sale, stocking, exhibiting or selling drugs except under a valid licence. Section 3(b)(ii) brings within the definition of drug substances intended for destruction of vermin or insects causing disease, and Rule 123 exempts drugs specified in Schedule K from Chapter IV of the Act and the Rules to the extent stated in that Schedule. Item 12 of Schedule K covers substances intended to be used for destruction of vermin or insects causing disease, namely antiseptics and disinfectants. On the label and on the nature of its use, Dettol was found to be used for disinfection of instruments, wards and other materials, and its external use on skin did not alter its character as a disinfectant. The fact that it may also have antiseptic use did not take it out of the exemption.
Conclusion: Dettol is a disinfectant covered by item 12 of Schedule K, and by virtue of Rule 123 it is exempt from the licensing requirement under Chapter IV of the Act. The prosecutions could not be sustained.
Final Conclusion: The complaints and the consequential criminal proceedings were quashed because no licence was required for stocking, exhibiting or selling Dettol.
Ratio Decidendi: A product does not cease to be a disinfectant merely because it can also be used externally as an antiseptic; if its essential character and use bring it within Schedule K, Rule 123 exempts it from the Chapter IV licensing regime.