Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a referable question of law arose from the Tribunal's order on the treatment of capital subsidy under section 43(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the purpose of depreciation and investment allowance.
Analysis: The question was found to be identical in substance to an issue already considered by other High Courts, and the fact that special leave had been granted by the Supreme Court in connected matters on the same point indicated that the issue was not merely academic. On that basis, the Court held that the statutory threshold for directing a reference was satisfied.
Conclusion: The question of law was held to be referable, and the Tribunal was directed under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 to state the case and refer the question to the Court.