Clearing and forwarding classification and freight valuation disputes justified waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.

Classification as a clearing and forwarding agent service, together with the includibility of ocean freight and air freight in taxable value, was treated as a contentious and debatable issue. The Tribunal noted that the Commissioner had not considered the High Court decision relied upon and that the freight component required detailed examination. On that basis, the appellant was found to have established a prima facie case for interim relief under section 35F of the Finance Act, 1994 as applied by section 83. Waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of service tax, interest and penalty was stayed during the appeal.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of service tax, interest and penalty.

Analysis: The demand arose from classification of the appellant's activity as clearing and forwarding agent service and from inclusion of ocean freight and air freight in the taxable value. The Tribunal noted that the Commissioner had not considered the High Court decision relied upon, and that the question whether the appellant could be treated as a clearing and forwarding agent was contentious. The includibility of actual freight paid was also found to be a highly debatable issue requiring detailed examination. On that basis, the appellant was held to have established a prima facie case for interim relief under section 35F of the Finance Act, 1994 as made applicable by section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994.

Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of service tax, interest and penalty was stayed during pendency of the appeal.

---