Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal required enhancement on the basis of the deceased's proved income and whether additional amounts were payable under conventional heads.
Analysis: The deceased's income was reassessed with reference to the material showing substantial advance tax and tax deducted at source paid during his lifetime, the assessment order under the Income-tax Act, and his business/professional profile. The Court treated the posthumous income-tax returns with caution, but held that they could not be ignored where the surrounding evidence established that the deceased had in fact earned substantially more than the income fixed by the Tribunal. The Court applied a one-fourth deduction for personal expenses, accepted the multiplier of 15 having regard to the age of the deceased, and added conventional sums towards funeral expenses and non-pecuniary damages.
Conclusion: The compensation was enhanced substantially and the appeal succeeded.
Final Conclusion: The award was modified by increasing the compensation, with interest on the enhanced amount and apportionment among the dependants.
Ratio Decidendi: For determining compensation in a motor accident claim, the deceased's lifetime tax payments and reliable surrounding evidence may justify reassessment of income, and posthumous tax returns are not conclusive if they are inconsistent with proved facts.