Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether CENVAT credit of service tax taken in March 2008 on input services received during the period from 31.12.2006 to February 2008 could be denied on the ground that it was not availed immediately or within a reasonable time.
Analysis: The earlier Tribunal decisions relied upon by the assessee were followed to hold that, in the absence of a specific statutory time limit, credit cannot be denied merely because it was not taken at the earliest opportunity. The reliance placed by Revenue on decisions suggesting a reasonable period was not accepted, because the cited observations of the Supreme Court only state that where no limitation is prescribed, courts should not import one by implication. The Board's clarification in Circular dated 29.08.2000 also stated that although credit may be taken at the earliest opportunity, delay in taking credit does not by itself justify denial of the benefit.
Conclusion: The denial of CENVAT credit was not sustainable, and the assessee was entitled to take the credit even though it was not availed immediately.
Ratio Decidendi: In the absence of an express statutory time limit, CENVAT credit cannot be denied solely because it was taken belatedly, unless a valid legal restriction is shown.