Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether higher depreciation at 50% was allowable on a truck given on lease when the assessee was not itself engaged in the business of running vehicles on hire.
Analysis: The claim for the higher rate of depreciation depended on the vehicle satisfying the condition in the relevant depreciation entry that motor buses, motor lorries and motor taxis must be used in a business of running them on hire. The Court held that the controlling test was whether the assessee was engaged in the business of hiring the vehicles or transportation by hire, and not merely whether the truck was leased to another party. The issue was treated as covered by earlier binding precedent and the Supreme Court's reasoning that the assessee must satisfy the statutory user condition for the higher allowance.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to the higher depreciation rate. The remand order was set aside and the Revenue's stand was accepted.