TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tax Tribunal rules on ONGC receipts: 10% profit rate applies for all, spare parts taxed under section 44BB.</h1> <h3>G and T Resources (Europe) Ltd. Versus DDIT</h3> G and T Resources (Europe) Ltd. Versus DDIT - TMI Issues Involved:1. Application of an arbitrary rate of 25% profit on the sale of spares/supplies.2. Taxability of sales conducted entirely outside India.3. Estimation of profit at 25% versus 10% for transactions attributable to India.Detailed Analysis:1. Application of an Arbitrary Rate of 25% Profit on Sale of Spares/Supplies:The assessee challenged the application of a 25% profit rate on the sale of spares/supplies by the Deputy Director. The assessee argued that the entire receipts should be subject to the provisions of section 44BB(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which prescribes a net profit rate of 10% for non-residents engaged in providing services or facilities in connection with, or supplying plant and machinery on hire, used in the prospecting for, or extraction or production of, mineral oils in India. The assessee cited the case of CIT v. B.J. Services Co. Middle East [2008] 300 ITR 392/170 Taxman 286, where the supply of spare parts in a turnkey contract was also covered under section 44BB.2. Taxability of Sales Conducted Entirely Outside India:The assessee contended that the sale of spares/supplies, which took place entirely outside India in the United Kingdom, should not be taxed in India. However, this ground was not pressed during the appeal, and the focus was shifted to the applicability of section 44BB on the entire receipts.3. Estimation of Profit at 25% Versus 10% for Transactions Attributable to India:The Assessing Officer had accepted the claim of the assessee under section 44BB(2) for receipts amounting to Rs. 1,59,12,886 related to repair/revamp services of cranes but rejected the claim of 1% on gross receipts related to spare parts, instead applying a 25% profit rate. The assessee's representative argued that the entire receipts should be taxed under section 44BB at a 10% net profit rate, including the supply of spares. The Tribunal referred to the contract clauses and noted that the supply of components was an indivisible part of the entire contract with ONGC, which is engaged in the extraction and production of mineral oils. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that the entire receipts, including the supply of spares, should be assessed under section 44BB at a 10% net profit rate on a presumptive basis.Conclusion:The appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed. The Tribunal ruled that the entire receipts from ONGC, including the supply of spares, should be assessed under section 44BB at a 10% net profit rate. The assessee's claim regarding the application of a 1% rate was forgone, and the focus was on the applicability of section 44BB to the entire contract receipts. The Tribunal's decision was based on the interpretation that the supply of spares in a turnkey contract is covered under section 44BB, as supported by the case of CIT v. B.J. Services Co. Middle East.
TaxTMI 