Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund of Service Tax paid on terminal handling charges and bill of lading charges was admissible under Notification No. 41/2007-ST, and whether the Revenue could raise a new objection regarding classification of the service in the absence of such a ground in the show cause notice.
Analysis: The objection that the service provider was registered under Business Auxiliary Service was not part of the show cause notice, which proceeded only on the alleged absence of authorization of the port service provider. A ground not put to notice cannot be introduced for the first time at the appellate stage. The Tribunal also relied on its earlier view that refund cannot be denied merely because the port services were rendered without authorization by the port.
Conclusion: The refund claim was held admissible and the Revenue's objection was rejected.