Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the court should answer the referred questions on the existing record or decline to answer and remit the matter for fresh factual determination.
Analysis: The questions concerned whether the disputed expenditure on maintenance of horses, carriages, motor cars and trustees' allowances formed part of the income applied for religious and charitable purposes or constituted allowable expenditure in computing income. The record did not show that the factual issue had been fully examined by the assessing authority, and the matter required consideration of the actual purpose and nature of the expenditure, including fresh evidence if necessary. In these circumstances, the court treated the controversy as one requiring proper fact-finding before any answer could be returned on the reference.
Conclusion: The court declined to answer the referred questions and remanded the matter to the Tribunal for fresh decision and further reference to the Assessing Officer if necessary.