Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether tower and lattice mast structures fabricated from iron and steel inputs and erected at site amounted to manufacture of excisable goods, and whether they were classifiable under Chapter sub-heading 7308.20.
Analysis: The inputs such as angles, pipes, tubes, flats, plates and sheets were cut, punched, drilled, welded, stamped, straightened, galvanised and finished into identifiable structural components having a distinct commercial identity before being fixed in the erected structure. Applying the principle that movable articles fabricated with separate identity are excisable goods even if later incorporated into an immovable structure, the fabricated tower components were treated as manufactured goods. The earlier view that no new goods came into existence was held to be inconsistent with the Larger Bench ruling and the later Division Bench decision following it.
Conclusion: The fabricated tower and lattice mast components were manufacture of excisable goods and were classifiable under Chapter sub-heading 7308.20; the demand under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was sustainable and the assessee was not entitled to relief.