Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether assessment proceedings were vitiated for non-issuance of notice to all legal heirs of the deceased donor, and whether the assessee could avoid liability on that ground.
Analysis: The notice under the gift-tax proceedings had been issued to the assessee, who was one of the legal heirs. The legal position applied was that a legal heir who has received notice cannot challenge the proceedings merely because notice was not served on every other legal heir. Non-service on some legal heirs is only an irregularity and does not invalidate the proceedings. The tax, interest and other dues attributable to the deceased donor can be recovered only from the estate inherited by the legal heirs and not from the gifted property itself.
Conclusion: The assessment was not invalidated by omission to issue notice to all legal heirs. The assessee remained liable to the extent of the inherited estate, and the objection based on defective notice was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded, the Tribunal's order was set aside, and the revenue was held entitled to proceed against the inherited estate in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: Service of notice on one legal heir is sufficient to sustain the proceedings against that heir, and non-service on other legal heirs is only an irregularity that does not nullify the assessment.