Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were liable to be sustained, or whether Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 protected the assessee on the ground of reasonable cause.
Analysis: The lower appellate authority had set aside the penalties after accepting that the assessee entertained a bona fide belief that small scale exemption was available, that the unit operated in a rural setting and catered mainly to poor students, and that the entire service tax and interest were paid immediately on receipt of the show-cause notice. These findings were not shown to be infirm or unsupported by the department.
Conclusion: The penalties were not restored and the appeal was rejected.