Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on a prima facie assessment, the applicants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit in respect of the duty demand and penalty arising from valuation of confectionery sold in multi-piece jars/pouches, and whether such packages were to be treated as retail packages attracting valuation under Section 4A rather than wholesale packages under Section 4.
Analysis: The legal position was treated as clear: goods sold in wholesale packages are assessed under Section 4, while retail packages, including multi-piece retail packages above the exempted weight limit of 20 grams, attract MRP-based valuation under Section 4A. The reasoning relied on the Larger Bench view that whether a package is retail or wholesale is a question of fact, and that multi-piece retail packages exceeding the prescribed weight limit are not entitled to the exemption under Rule 34(b). In the present matter, the department did not produce evidence to show that the jars/pouches were wholesale packages, while the applicants produced material indicating retail sale and MRP declaration. On that basis, the package character was, prima facie, aligned with the retail-package line of authority.
Conclusion: The applicants made out a prima facie case for application of Section 4A and for waiver of pre-deposit during pendency of the appeals.