Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, while making a provisional assessment under section 20 of the Karnataka Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1957, the assessing authority could disregard the basis disclosed in the return and apply a different valuation rate under rule 9(c) of the Rules.
Analysis: Section 20 requires the assessing authority to proceed in a summary manner and to make a provisional assessment on the basis of the return and the accompanying accounts and documents. The provision does not authorise a roving enquiry into disputed questions of law or fact, nor does it permit the authority to reject the assessee's declared basis and substitute a different standard of its own choice. The scope of provisional assessment is limited, and the analogy of section 141 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, shows that the return as filed or as clarified must be taken as the foundation for the provisional computation. Rule 9(c) can be invoked only when its jurisdictional conditions are satisfied, which is a matter for regular assessment, not provisional assessment.
Conclusion: The assessing authority could not, at the provisional assessment stage, apply a different rate than that returned by the assessee; the action was unauthorised and the challenge succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: A provisional assessment must be made summarily on the basis of the assessee's return and accompanying material, without rejecting the returned basis or deciding disputed questions that belong to regular assessment.