Permanent establishment analysis under the India-UK DTAA required fresh review of commission taxability and treaty agency tests.

Commission paid to a non-resident was analysed in light of the India-UK DTAA, with the withdrawn Circular No. 23 of 1969 found to be an improper basis for deciding the issue. The central question was whether Article 5(4)(c) and Article 5(5) applied, particularly on allegations that the Indian entity habitually secured orders wholly or almost wholly for the foreign enterprise and operated in a manner relevant to permanent establishment analysis. As those treaty provisions had not been examined in proper perspective, the appellate authority's order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration after giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing.

---

---

Issues: Whether the matter concerning taxability of commission paid to the non-resident and the applicability of Article 5(4)(c) and Article 5(5) of the India-UK DTAA required fresh consideration by the appellate authority.

Analysis: The commission arrangement was held to have a sufficient nexus with operations in India, and reliance on the withdrawn Circular No. 23 dated 23-7-1969 was found to be misplaced. However, the appellate authority had not examined the applicability of Article 5(4)(c) and Article 5(5) of the India-UK DTAA in proper perspective, particularly the allegations that the Indian entity habitually secured orders wholly or almost wholly for the foreign enterprise and functioned in a relationship relevant to permanent establishment analysis. Since those treaty provisions were central to the determination of taxability and had not been adequately addressed, the matter required reconsideration.

Conclusion: The order of the appellate authority was set aside and the issue was remanded for fresh consideration of Article 5(4)(c) and Article 5(5) of the India-UK DTAA, with opportunity of hearing to the assessee.

---