Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Tribunal sets aside assessments on deceased person, citing Income Tax Act - Procedural compliance emphasized</h1> <h3>Late Smt. Laxmibai Karanpuria Versus ACIT</h3> Late Smt. Laxmibai Karanpuria Versus ACIT - TMI Issues:1. Assessment validity on a deceased person.2. Applicability of section 159(2) in the case.Analysis:Issue 1: Assessment validity on a deceased personThe case involved appeals against orders of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) relating to Assessment years 1989-90 and 1990-91. The legal issue raised was whether assessment could be framed on a dead person. The search was conducted after the death of the assessee, and it was argued that no valid assessment could be made on a deceased individual. The Tribunal agreed, citing precedents and Section 159(2) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that proceedings initiated after the death of the assessee could not lead to a valid assessment on the deceased person. The decision was supported by various judicial pronouncements and the dismissal of a Special Leave Petition by the Hon'ble Apex Court.Issue 2: Applicability of section 159(2)The learned Sr. DR argued that Section 159(2) allowed proceedings that could have been taken against the deceased to be continued against the legal representatives. However, the Tribunal found that as no proceedings were initiated against the deceased before their death, Section 159(2) was not applicable in this case. The Tribunal emphasized that the search warrants were issued in the name of the deceased, rendering the search and subsequent assessment invalid. The decision was further strengthened by a previous Tribunal ruling and relevant judicial precedents.In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed both appeals, setting aside the assessments made on the deceased person. The judgment highlighted the legal principle that assessments cannot be validly framed on individuals who have passed away before the initiation of proceedings, emphasizing the importance of procedural compliance and legal standing in such cases.