Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Application to rectify stay order error for tax credits dismissed by tribunal.</h1> The department's application to rectify an error in a stay order, seeking reversal of input duty credit and input service tax credit, was dismissed by the ... Rectification of mistake - Revenue submits that the stay order purported to call for reversal of both input duty credit and input service tax credit, but, in the operative part of the order, input service tax credit was omitted to be mentioned - Hence, an application for rectification of mistake is not maintainable against a Misc. order of the tribunal - This application has not brought out the quantitative effect of the proposed rectification - Apparently, the effect is negligent - Thus, the application is dismissed. The department filed an application to rectify an error in a stay order, seeking reversal of input duty credit and input service tax credit. The tribunal dismissed the application, stating it was not maintainable against a miscellaneous order and the proposed rectification had a negligible effect.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
