Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand of duty and penalties could be sustained by denying deemed cenvat credit on the allegation that grey fabrics were never received or processed at the appellant's premises.
Analysis: The Revenue's case rested mainly on the statement of a person from the merchant exporter, while the appellant's director consistently stated that the grey fabrics were received, entered in statutory records, processed, and cleared on payment of duty. Those statements were supported by the appellant's records, and no independent corroboration was produced to show that the records were false or that the goods were never received. The fact that the exporter's rebate documents were found forged did not, by itself, establish that the appellant had not processed the goods. The payment of duty from the PLA also supported the appellant's version.
Conclusion: The allegation of non-receipt and non-processing was not proved, and the denial of credit, duty demand, and penalties could not be sustained.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appellants were granted consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the Revenue's allegation is unsupported by independent corroborative evidence and the assessee's statutory records and consistent statements establish receipt, processing, and duty-paid clearance of goods, credit denial and consequential duty and penalty cannot be sustained.