Tribunal overstepped jurisdiction in recalling order, court quashes decision on house property deletion.

The court held that the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by recalling the original order and directing a fresh hearing on the deletion of Rs. 17,17,205 related to unexplained house property. The Tribunal's action was deemed impermissible as it amounted to passing a fresh order in appeal. Despite maintaining a correction in the figures, the court quashed the order setting aside the deletion of Rs. 17,17,205 and granted the Revenue liberty to challenge the Tribunal's decision before the appropriate forum, with any delays condoned.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge to the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding the deletion of a sum of Rs. 17,17,205 based on the DVO's valuation.

Analysis:
The petitioner challenged the order passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack, under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which partly allowed the appeal by directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of Rs. 17,17,205 related to unexplained house property. The Revenue filed a Miscellaneous Petition seeking a review of the Tribunal's finding, which was accepted, setting aside the order and directing a fresh hearing. The petitioner contended that the Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction in exercising review power under section 254(2) contrary to a decision of a Division Bench of the court. The court noted that an order under section 254(2) does not exist independently of the original order under section 254(1).

The court examined the correctness of the Tribunal's order recalling the original order and directing readjudication of the issue of deletion of Rs. 17,17,205. It was found that the Tribunal's exercise of power under section 254(2) amounted to passing a fresh order in appeal, which is impermissible. The Tribunal's decision was based on factual and legal aspects raised in the appeal, particularly on the lack of material evidence supporting the addition based on the DVO's report. The court held that the Tribunal's action was beyond its scope and quashed the order setting aside the deletion of Rs. 17,17,205. However, a correction in the figures was maintained, and the Revenue was granted liberty to challenge the Tribunal's order before the appropriate forum, with any delays condoned.

---