TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court rules second rectification application on same issue not maintainable under Income-tax Act</h1> <h3>Commissioner of Income-tax Versus Aiswarya Trading Co.</h3> Commissioner of Income-tax Versus Aiswarya Trading Co. - [2011] 331 ITR 521 (Ker.) Issues:Appeal against Tribunal's refusal to entertain a rectification application under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.Analysis:The case involved an appeal against the Tribunal's decision to not entertain a rectification application filed by the Revenue under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The matter originated from the contestation of income-tax assessment for the year 1994-95 by the respondent-assessee. The Tribunal remanded the issue to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration, leading to an enhanced assessment by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) in the second round. The Tribunal then fixed the net income from arrack at Rs. 10 per litre but omitted to consider a ground related to interest levy under section 220(2) in the revised assessment. Consequently, the assessee filed a rectification application to rectify the appellate order, which was allowed by the Tribunal. Subsequently, the Revenue filed a rectification application, which the Tribunal held as not maintainable under section 254(2) as it pertained to the same issue already decided in the assessee's rectification application.The High Court analyzed the merit of the second rectification application on the same issue and held that it was not maintainable before the Tribunal. The Court clarified that the original order could be rectified on other issues decided by the Tribunal, not covered by the rectification order. It emphasized that allowing the same issue to be raised in multiple rectification applications would provide the Tribunal an opportunity to review its own order, exceeding its statutory powers. The Court ruled that once an issue is decided in a rectification application, another application on the same issue is not maintainable against the order issued under section 254(2) of the Act. It was concluded that the second rectification application by either party is permissible only on issues not previously decided by the Tribunal in any rectification application. The judgment upheld the Tribunal's decision and dismissed the Department's appeal, citing the principle that the appellate order under section 254(1) merges with rectification orders only on the issues raised in the rectification application.In summary, the High Court's judgment provided a detailed analysis of the maintainability of rectification applications under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, emphasizing the limitations on raising the same issue in multiple rectification applications. The Court's ruling clarified the scope of rectification proceedings and the boundaries within which such applications can be entertained, ensuring the proper administration of justice and adherence to statutory provisions.
TaxTMI 