TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal upholds Service Tax on detention charges, reduces penalty to Tax amount. Categorization and statutory provisions key.</h1> <h3>MARINE CONTAINER SERVICES (SOUTH) P. LTD. Versus CCE., TIRUNELVELI</h3> MARINE CONTAINER SERVICES (SOUTH) P. LTD. Versus CCE., TIRUNELVELI - 2011 (21) S.T.R. 377 (Tri. - Chennai) Issues: Appeal against confirmation of demand of Service Tax on detention charges and logistic fee.Analysis:1. Detention Charges: The appeal challenged the demand of Service Tax amounting to Rs. 88,782 on detention charges collected from shippers on behalf of the shipping line. The Tribunal observed that after deducting local expenses and repatriating some amount to principals, the assessees retained a portion of the amount as per RBI norms for administrative purposes. The retained amount was categorized as husbandry fees, including the detention charges which were also retained for administrative work. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the demand of Service Tax under this heading.2. Logistic Fee: The Tribunal also addressed the logistic fee issue, determining it to be a receipt paid to an agent for container handling, which falls under the husbandry fee category. Although the shipping line fully reimbursed the actual expenses related to container husbandry, the fee paid to the agent for monitoring operations was not deductible from the taxable value. Therefore, the Service Tax demand on this count was upheld. The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's plea for re-quantification as it was not raised before the adjudicating authority or the lower appellate authority.3. Penalty: Regarding the penalty, the Tribunal noted that the statute allows for a maximum penalty of twice the Service Tax amount. However, considering the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal deemed the maximum penalty unwarranted. Consequently, the penalty was reduced to the amount of Service Tax upheld, which was Rs. 88,782. The appeal was partly allowed based on these considerations.In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the demand of Service Tax on both detention charges and logistic fee, while reducing the penalty to the amount of Service Tax upheld. The decision was made based on the categorization of the charges and fees involved, as well as the statutory provisions regarding penalties.
TaxTMI 