Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee, having registered and paid service tax during the financial year, could later claim the benefit of the exemption notification available to service providers whose aggregate value of taxable services did not exceed the prescribed limit.
Analysis: The exemption under the notification was optional. Clause 2(i) allowed the provider of taxable service either not to avail the exemption and to pay service tax, and provided that once such option was exercised in a financial year, it could not be withdrawn during the remaining part of that financial year. The assessee's plea of having acted on wrong advice did not alter the factual position that the option to pay tax had already been exercised.
Conclusion: The denial of the exemption was justified and the assessee was not entitled to resile from the option already exercised in the financial year.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the demand, interest, and penalty were sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification grants an assessee an option either to avail the exemption or to pay tax, the option once exercised in a financial year cannot be withdrawn for the remainder of that year.