Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand and penalty could be sustained when the adjudicating authority relied on grounds and material going beyond the show cause notice.
Analysis: The notice was issued on the stated basis that the assessee had manufactured and cleared Erythromycin powder without payment of duty and that it was correctly classifiable under Chapter Sub-heading 2941.50. The adjudicating authority, while confirming the demand, relied upon additional material and reasoning to conclude that the product was an antibiotic and not an animal feed supplement. The appellate authority found that the notice did not set out those additional grounds, and that the authority below could not travel beyond the case made out in the notice. The record also showed that the department's allegation that the product was not what it was represented to be was not supported in the manner required to sustain the demand on a basis not pleaded in the notice.
Conclusion: The demand and penalty could not be sustained on grounds beyond the show cause notice, and the assessee succeeded.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the order dropping the demand was maintained.
Ratio Decidendi: A demand cannot be confirmed on grounds not contained in the show cause notice, and adjudication must remain confined to the case pleaded therein.