Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Service Tax could be levied on training and coaching provided by an institution functioning as a parallel college and recognised as a centre for a university distance education programme leading to a certificate, diploma or degree.
Analysis: The institution produced a memorandum of understanding showing that it functioned as a centre for enrolment in the university's distance education programme. The Court applied the ratio that levy of Service Tax on parallel colleges is arbitrary and discriminatory when regular affiliated colleges are exempt, since the burden ultimately falls on students and treatment of similarly placed students differs without justification. Training and coaching that form an essential part of a recognised university course or curriculum were treated as part of the educational process rather than a taxable service in these facts.
Conclusion: Service Tax on the coaching and training activity was not justified, and the assessee succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: A levy of Service Tax on coaching or training that is an essential component of a recognised university course, when comparable regular educational institutions are exempt, is discriminatory and cannot be sustained.