1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Madras HC Upholds Tribunal Decision on Penalty Deletion</h1> The Madras HC upheld the Tribunal's decision to delete the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) as the claim of depreciation on goodwill was deemed genuine. ... Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The respondent/assessee stated to have claimed depreciation on goodwill - According to the appellant such claim was rejected in the earlier assessment years - The assessee chose to make the claim for the present assessment year also - On that basis, it cannot be held that the claim itself was bogus - Tribunal held that the claim of depreciation was not a bogus claim - Therefore, mere disallowance would not attract levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) - The appeal fails and the same is dismissed. The Madras High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to delete the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) as the claim of depreciation on goodwill was not considered bogus. The appeal was dismissed.