Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refractory material used for lining a rotary kiln in cement manufacture was eligible for Modvat credit as capital goods under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The disallowance was based on the view that the goods fell under Chapter 38 and therefore could not be treated as capital goods for the relevant period. The Tribunal followed its earlier decision on identical facts, which held that Whytheat and similar refractory materials used for lining rotary kilns were covered by the explanation to Rule 57Q(1) as it stood before the relevant amendment and were eligible for credit under the erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Conclusion: The refractory material was eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q and the denial of credit was unsustainable.