Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the refund claim for service tax on export of goods was barred by limitation for being filed beyond the time prescribed in the relevant notification and the Board's clarification, and whether the delay could be condoned.
Analysis: The time limit for refund claims was governed by the applicable exemption notification and the Board's circular clarifying the filing period. For exports made during March 2008, the claim had to be filed within the prescribed period under paragraph 2(e) of the notification. For exports made from April to June 2008, the clarified outer limit was 31.12.2008. The claim in question was filed on 02.01.2009, after the prescribed deadline. The delay was only a few days, but the time limit was statutory in character and no power of condonation was available to the authorities under the notification scheme.
Conclusion: The refund claim was rightly held to be time-barred, and the rejection of the claim was upheld in favour of the Revenue.