Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit could be denied on minor shortage in molasses transferred between two divisions of the same legal entity within the same registered premises, when there was no finding of diversion and the loss was attributable to storage, drayage and handling/transit loss.
Analysis: The transfer was between divisions of the same factory and the same legal entity, not between different legal entities. The record showed no diversion of the invoiced quantity, and the shortage was minimal. Molasses being a material susceptible to moisture and natural weight variation, small losses within the factory premises were treated as normal and not as a basis to deny credit. The reasoning adopted in the larger bench decision on transit loss supported allowance of credit where the facts showed receipt and use of the goods without diversion.
Conclusion: Denial of credit was not justified and the assessee was entitled to relief.
Final Conclusion: The order denying credit was set aside and the appeal succeeded with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Minor and explainable loss in quantity of duty-paid inputs transferred within the same legal entity, without any diversion, is not a valid ground to deny credit.