Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 271(1)(c) read with Explanation 5 was leviable when no statement under section 132(4) was recorded during the search and the assessee later disclosed the income and paid tax.
Analysis: The search was interrupted and concluded without recording the assessee's statement under section 132(4). The assessee thereafter made a disclosure at the first available opportunity, furnished the particulars sought, paid advance tax, and returned the income within time. In these circumstances, the deeming fiction of concealment under Explanation 5 could not be applied in isolation from the statutory requirement of a statement under section 132(4), and the assessee's conduct showed bona fide compliance rather than concealment.
Conclusion: Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was not sustainable and the assessee was entitled to immunity from penalty.