TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether bleaching, dyeing and processing of grey fabrics amounts to manufacture under the Textiles Committee Act, 1963; (ii) Whether the meaning of manufacture under Section 2(f) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 applies for construing manufacture under the Textiles Committee Act, 1963; (iii) Whether job workers processing grey fabrics are liable to pay cess under the Act.
Issue (i): Whether bleaching, dyeing and processing of grey fabrics amounts to manufacture under the Textiles Committee Act, 1963
Analysis: The processing of grey fabric by bleaching, dyeing, printing and finishing was held to bring about a real and irreversible transformation in the commodity. The finished fabric acquires a different character, name, use and commercial identity from the grey fabric received for processing. On that footing, the activity is manufacture for the purpose of the cess provision.
Conclusion: Yes. Such processing amounts to manufacture under the Textiles Committee Act, 1963.
Issue (ii): Whether the meaning of manufacture under Section 2(f) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 applies for construing manufacture under the Textiles Committee Act, 1963
Analysis: The Textiles Committee (Cess) Rules, 1975 link maintenance of registers, filing of returns and assessment to duty paid and returns filed under the Central Excise law, and the scheme of the Act shows that the expression manufacturer in Section 5A(3) was intended to bear the same meaning as in the Central Excise law. The Act and the Rules therefore justify borrowing the Central Excise definition for the purpose of identifying the liable manufacturer.
Conclusion: Yes. The meaning of manufacture under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 applies.
Issue (iii): Whether job workers processing grey fabrics are liable to pay cess under the Act
Analysis: The liability is attracted at the stage of manufacture, not merely because the processor works on job basis. The exemption for handloom and powerloom industries does not extend to independent processing units dealing with finished processing operations. Where the processed commodity is a commercially different product, the processor falls within the charging provision and cannot claim exemption on the ground that the raw material originated from an exempt source.
Conclusion: Yes. Job workers are liable to pay cess under the Act.
Final Conclusion: The questions were answered against the petitioners, the cess demand was upheld, and the writ petitions were dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where processing converts grey fabric into a commercially distinct finished fabric, the activity constitutes manufacture for cess purposes, and the manufacturer liability under the Textiles Committee Act, 1963 is determined by the Central Excise meaning of manufacturer as incorporated by the Act and Rules.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
