Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned order required interference and remand for fresh consideration of the clearance-value computation in light of a later Tribunal decision.
Analysis: The later Tribunal decision relied upon by the assessee was not available when the Commissioner (Appeals) passed the order. The Tribunal also noted that the Commissioner (Appeals) had already remanded the matter for re-quantification, and that the original adjudicating authority should reconsider the entire issue afresh with due opportunity to the assessee.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority, with all issues kept open.