Deemed transfer under a development agreement and exclusion of excise duty from turnover shape tax computation.

A development agreement may trigger a deemed transfer for capital gains when possession, effective control, and supporting conduct show that the purchaser has acquired rights falling within section 2(47)(v) read with section 53A; on the text given, the land was treated as transferred in the relevant year and later-year tax credit was rejected. For section 80HHC computation, excise duty was held to fall outside total turnover because it does not arise from trading turnover; on that basis, it was excluded from the formula and the assessee's claim on this point was accepted.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the transfer of land for capital gains purposes took place in the year under appeal under section 2(47)(v) and section 2(47)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and whether the taxes paid in later assessment years on the same capital gain could be given credit in the year under appeal; (ii) whether excise duty was required to be excluded from total turnover while computing deduction under section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Issue (i): Whether the transfer of land for capital gains purposes took place in the year under appeal under section 2(47)(v) and section 2(47)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and whether the taxes paid in later assessment years on the same capital gain could be given credit in the year under appeal.

Analysis: The agreement, possession letter, subsequent construction activity, and the purchaser's confirmations showed that complete control over the land had passed in the relevant previous year. On that basis, the transaction fell within the deeming fiction of transfer under section 2(47)(v), and the alternative contention that possession was not handed over was rejected. On the credit issue, the majority held that the request to adjust taxes paid in later years was only incidental to the disposal of the appeal and could not be used to alter assessments of other years.

Conclusion: The capital gain was taxable in the year under appeal, and the claim for credit of taxes paid in later years was rejected.

Issue (ii): Whether excise duty was required to be excluded from total turnover while computing deduction under section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: The computation issue was covered by binding precedent holding that excise duty does not form part of turnover for the purposes of section 80HHC because it does not emanate from trading turnover and cannot be treated as export turnover or total turnover for the formula.

Conclusion: Excise duty had to be excluded from total turnover, and the assessee's claim on this issue was upheld.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded on the capital gains issue but failed on the section 80HHC computation issue, resulting in a partial allowance of the Revenue's appeal.

Ratio Decidendi: A transaction is taxable as a transfer in the year in which possession and effective control over immovable property pass under a development agreement, and excise duty is not includible in total turnover for section 80HHC computation.

---