Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount set apart in a transfer for the education of the assessee's children could be treated as a gift and whether the sum of Rs. 1,12,178 was exempt under section 5(1)(xii) of the Gift-tax Act.
Analysis: The amount earmarked for the children's education represented expenditure that a parent is obliged to meet and, to that extent, did not amount to a gift. That obligation was not confined to higher or specialised education but extended to ordinary school education as well. The Board's instructions could not alter the legal character of actual educational expenditure. On the facts, the children were already in school and the appellate finding that the amount was genuinely set apart for educational expenses was supported by the record.
Conclusion: The amount of Rs. 1,12,178 was rightly treated as exempt under section 5(1)(xii) of the Gift-tax Act, and the question was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Money transferred genuinely and specifically for meeting a parent's obligation to provide education to children does not constitute a taxable gift to that extent and is exempt under section 5(1)(xii) of the Gift-tax Act.