Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the exempt by-product "tobacco refuse" emerging during manufacture of cigarettes and cut tobacco could be treated as a final product for the purpose of Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, so as to require payment of 10% of its value.
Analysis: The Revenue itself had treated "tobacco refuse" as a by-product in the show cause notice and in the adjudication order. Its classification under the tariff and exemption by notification did not alter its character as a by-product arising incidentally in the course of manufacture of the appellants' final products. The distinction drawn by the appellate authority on the ground that the item was a specified tariff entry and exempted by notification was held not to be material. The legal position applied was that an exempt by-product does not cease to be a by-product merely because it is separately identifiable in the tariff and exempt from duty.
Conclusion: The demand under Rule 6 was not sustainable, and the assessee was not liable to pay 10% of the value of the exempt by-product.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: An item that emerges incidentally as a by-product during manufacture does not become a final product for Rule 6 purposes merely because it is separately classified in the tariff and exempted from duty by notification.